And I became a supporter of formula-feeding.
That's not to say I'm anti-breastfeeding. Not at all. I think it's a beautiful and wonderful and wise thing to do. But, after unforeseen factors began to stack up against my little guy and me, formula feeding ended up saving our relationship. I mentioned it in previous posts, but I really feel that feeding my baby formula has allowed me to keep my sanity.
What interests me is that, although science has pretty consistently proven that breastmilk is best for most babies and in most situations, the long-term differences between breastfed and bottle-fed babies don't seem that significant.
I don't have any resources to cite right now, but my friend Jaime, who out of medical necessity formula fed all four of her gorgeous girls, made a great point when I was preparing to give birth to my son.
"When they publish all those studies in support of breastfeeding," she observed (and I am paraphrasing here), "and the results always state that breastfeeding results in healthier, smarter babies, they don't take other factors into play. They do not consider the education level of the moms, the family's income, the foods consumed by the mothers, the health of the mothers, the socio-economics involved."
She makes a great point. Those breastfed babies who "never get sick"...is that a result of their food alone...that in conjunction with, say, their parents' finances? Did mom and dad have better access to medical care? Live in a less-polluted environment? Keep baby out of daycare or other settings that might expose them to more germs? And, those bottle-fed babies who were "prone to be heavier"...was that because of the formula itself, or because mom and dad never modeled healthy eating habits, or allowed junior to play video games instead of riding his bicycle? I don't believe that these studies can account for this huge range of variables. So, even though I still think breastmilk is a great option for many moms (dare I say, most?), it isn't fair to put formula in a corner and label it "evil".
I'm sure there are vitriolic "lactivists" out there who would condemn me for "quitting" and "giving up" on my baby. They might think that I was "condemning him" to a life of "sickness and disease" by ending breastfeeding after seven weeks of painful, distressing efforts. "Everyone can do it," I've heard from that camp. "It's really very, very rare that a mother cannot produce milk for her child."
Even if that is so, my baby was a preemie with a high palate that affected his ability to latch, causing feedings to be difficult and unsatisfying for him, and painful and disheartening for me. Three weeks in, I was already resenting my own, beloved, prayed-for and sweet-faced son.
That was causing him more damage than offering him a bottle, people. And it was certainly damaging to me, as well. Any motherly feelings of warmth and love would literally be drained out of me when he began to express signs of hunger. I would quietly sob at night when those faint wails began to drift over the baby monitor. They would culminate in hysterical cries, from both myself and my helpless infant.
I hated what I was becoming. It would have been hard enough to battle the post-natal hormones if nursing had gone well, but with feeding upon feeding resulting in a hungry, angry baby, things were worse. I was so furious and guilty because the one thing that I didn't want to compromise as a new mom seemed out of my reach.
I got advice - usually unsolicited, of course - suggesting a lactation consult (I had several, thanks), a certain kind of tea (after nine months of decaf, people, I wanted COFFEE), pumping ideas (always pump right after a feeding - yes, I see - so, while my slow-poke eater takes an hour to gum away at his lunch, I am to spend his naptime pumping, only to wake and feed him again a half an hour after I pump...around the clock?) - and I think some ladies were genuinely convinced I was hurting my baby by feeding him formula. One friend was even briefly shocked when I mentioned my husband was feeding the baby, before he realized that we hadn't been successful at breastfeeding.
Even though I am not so very far removed from the situation, I can still look back on my baby's seven-week mark and say that the best choice I personally could have made for him was sticking a bottle of formula is his screaming little mouth. With the pressure and stress of breastfeeding gone, I was able to begin to actually enjoy my son and see him as a blessing, a tiny human to love and cherish, rather than a voracious, demanding little beast who was physically hurting me 8-12 times daily. He has slept through the night since we switched to the bottle. I won't crow proudly over the crowds of moms whose babies are still nursing every two hours, because frankly, I have no idea of formula was the magic bullet that did it for him. If anything, it was the fact that he finally had a full tummy, and that mommy was calmer and more peaceful when she was with him. They say infants can sense that, right? Well, if I were a baby suddenly getting way chill, happy vibes coming from my mama, I'd sleep more soundly, too!
Photo credit: Brent Miller |
Hence, the Mommy Wars continue.
That is why I choose to share my struggles and reasons for breastfeeding. Someday, when my son is old enough - and maybe when he sees a mom breastfeeding in public and asks what is going on - I can tell him that nursing is a beautiful thing, but I chose to formula-feed him because I love him.
No comments:
Post a Comment